Block Immodest Profile Pictures
Mutual could create a button that says “Immodest” in a corner of the screen that shows up for users when swiping through profile pictures.
The idea is that if 5 or more different people hit the “Immodest” button on a certain picture in someone’s profile, then that picture would be hidden from future viewers.
The person who owns the profile should also have a way to see which of their profile pictures are being hidden and which ones are not.
This way no user accounts would have to be reported or removed. Instead inappropriate pictures could simply be hidden.
Comments: 9
-
12 Aug, '24
SamSide Note: This idea I posted will likely need some adjustments to actually become a reality, but I posted this to get the main idea across.
3 -
06 Oct, '24
JonathanI just report people who are in modest profile pictures, and when you report someone at automatically block them, I think
-
25 Oct, '24
ZachMaybe just blur it like how you blur spoilers on reddit where you can tap a button and undo the blur.
3 -
09 Nov, '24
SamYeah that sounds like a great idea. That would probably be a better way to do it.
-
19 Nov, '24
LCThis is a unique idea. I’ve honestly went across some profiles that it seems like their profile pictures have not been screened by anyone, and they are not appropriate at all. And actually contrary/contradictory to the whole point of gospel membership.
1
If the people at Mutual can see how many times a persons profile picture, whichever ones they are, have been “muted,”, this might be a good indicator to creating a standard/threshold over which people maybe shouldn’t be posting. -
05 Dec, '24
JosephYou could also make it an optional feature.
2
For example you could turn on “Blur immodest pictures mode” or have it turned off if you don’t want any pictures to be blurred. -
25 Dec, '24
PrestonI just wanna say that I agree that modesty is something that is not being respected as it should. It is a responsibility of both men and women to uphold modesty and virtue. I think this would be a very useful idea.
-
03 Jan
BKWhile I agree that modesty is key and something I look for, I don’t think it’s my place to determine whether someone else is following that standard. Other people may not have the same standards and should not be required to adhere to them just because we share the same religion.
2 -
05 Jan
CalebSo who is to judge and decide if it an immodest picture or not? Just because YOU might not like what the person is wearing, doesn’t mean it’s immodest. That’s the biggest problem with people in the LDS Church, you tend to make assumptions based on what you do or don’t like. If the person in the picture is comfortable sharing a photo of themselves in a swim suit or maybe short shorts, then who are you to judge them and say that’s wrong and that shouldn’t be seen? If a guy or girl feels comfortable in what they are sharing then it should be shared. Of course we aren’t talking nudes, but that is up to them. If you don’t like it, don’t swipe up on them. It’s that simple.
4
If it’s a decision based on how they look and you’re jealous of them, then maybe do something about it instead of trying to make them feel less by saying they’re being immodest or inappropriate.